The rules never drift.

It is a research-backed scanner built on a price action thesis. It continuously evaluates a bounded universe of liquid instruments, identifies structural events such as breakouts and breakout failures, qualifies them against defined conditions, derives the entry, invalidation and target from the structure itself, and has an AI layer write the explanation. It is analysis software — not an advisory service and not a trading system.

No, and nobody honestly can. Trading in securities, derivatives and commodities carries risk, including the risk of losing your capital. Structural analysis changes the quality of what you are looking at. It does not change the fact that any individual setup can reach its invalidation rather than its target.

No. There is no execution layer, no broker integration and no automated order placement, and we never hold, request or store broker or exchange credentials. The scanner surfaces structures and shows the working behind them; every order is placed by you, through your own broker, at your own discretion.

It explains — and only explains. Detection and qualification are fully deterministic: the same conditions produce the same result on the same data, every time. Once a setup has qualified, the AI reads those deterministic facts and writes the analysis: what formed, what it means structurally, what would invalidate it and what to watch. It cannot create a setup, or promote one that failed the conditions. Its report does include a setup rating and a confidence read, but those are written after qualification and change nothing about it — no rating can push a setup through the conditions, or hold one back that met them. Its output is also checked before it is stored — a price outside the real geometry, or an observation not present in the facts, is rejected rather than shown.

A candidate is an instrument or setup that has passed the scanner's initial conditions and been selected for further qualification. It is a shortlist entry, not a conclusion — and it is never a recommendation to trade. Some candidates never qualify. Some qualify and then fail. The word is deliberately unexciting because the thing it describes is deliberately unexciting: an item worth your attention next, nothing more.

It is the price at which the setup is demonstrably wrong. For a failed breakout it is the failure extreme — the furthest price reached beyond the level — taken unbuffered, because beyond that point the breakout did not actually fail. It is the same quantity a trader would call a stop, named for what it means structurally rather than for the order type you might use to act on it. It is always shown before the outcome, never after. In simple words, it is what most traders would call the Stop Loss.

It is the nearest opposing structural level — a real price the market has previously reacted to, in the direction the setup travels. It is deliberately not a multiple of risk: setting the target at, say, twice the risk would make the reward-to-risk figure true by construction and therefore meaningless. Because the target is a real level, a level sitting in the way simply becomes the target, and the reward shrinks honestly. In simple words, it is what most traders would call the Take Profit.

Equities, index derivatives, commodities, forex and crypto — over 300 instruments across those markets, on the venues listed in the coverage section. Three timeframes are scanned, each mapped to a trading style: 5m for intraday, 1h for swing and 1d for positional. Forex majors and minors and major crypto pairs are covered on the same three timeframes.

The structural thesis is the same everywhere — a level, a break, a rejection, in that order. What differs is the context it is read in: liquidity, volatility, session length and contract mechanics are not the same for an index derivative, a mid-cap equity and an MCX commodity contract, and a reading that ignored those differences would be convenient rather than correct.

You define the risk value for a single idea. The evaluation takes the entry and the invalidation level, derives the risk per unit from the distance between them, applies the instrument's lot or contract specification where one exists, and shows the resulting suggested quantity — lots for derivatives and commodities, shares for equities. It is arithmetic on values you supply, shown step by step. It is not risk control, not a recommended size, and it cannot prevent a loss larger than the figure you entered.

The study of what price is actually doing — market structure, levels, breaks, rejections, continuation and failure — read directly from price and its context, rather than inferred from an indicator calculated on that same price. The full thesis, the concepts it works with and its limits are set out on the price action page, which also distinguishes general price action education from what this scanner implements.

A screener filters on values — price above a moving average, RSI below a threshold, volume above an average. It has no concept of sequence. This evaluates an ordered structural sequence over time: a level must be established, then broken, then rejected, in that order, against defined conditions. A screener can tell you where price is. It cannot tell you what price did, and it does not hand you an invalidation level.

Traders who already trade and already know what a level, an invalidation and a lot are. A newer trader can learn from the explanation attached to each setup, but the product does not teach you to trade and decides nothing on your behalf. An experienced trader gets the part that does not scale by hand: consistent evaluation across the universe, on every candle close, without the standard drifting by the second hour.